...one NSF “senior official” was discovered to have spent as much as 20 percent of his working hours over a two-year interval “viewing sexually explicit images...
So out of two years, this "senior official" spent just shy of 100 days looking at porn? I cant believe it. Most of that time had to be spent downloading on those slow-ass govt. computers. To be honest, I cant think of anything better to...
...promote the progress of science; advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; secure the national defense...
I cant think of a single person who hasn't benefited from porn in today's society. But alas, weren't they asking for "stimulus" a bit ago? That's called irony, i guess. Which leads me to the money quote of the article...
...staffers who were “acutely embarrassed” by the filth-filled environment — like the employee who learned of a co-worker’s adventures in porn via sounds overheard from said co-worker’s computer speakers.
Acutely embarrassed.?! This is why Daddy watches without sound bitches.
1 comment:
You can enjoy porn without sound? How do you know if the people are in love?
Can't people hold of from doing deviant sexual viewing until they get home and do it in the privacy of their own dark basements? (Or at least do it while standing outside your ex-wife's bedroom window)
What do you mean "IF a year is 52 weeks," do you know something I don't?
Post a Comment