Friday, November 30, 2007
Thursday, November 29, 2007
Say Hello to the New Closer
It hurts me to say it, but I was wrong in my Houston Street prediction....According to espin, and MLBTR, David Riske is really close to signing with the Brewers. Maybe a bit too much money, but he is a decent middle to back end reliever with decent career numbers. His fancy pants player card is here, and his MLB.com numbers are here. As I have said before, the maths are not my strong suit, but lets take a better look....
He gets a lot of outs that arent strike outs, as evidenced by the 69 innings pitched, and 52 ks last year. Career wise, it looks pretty much the same at 431 innings and 398 ks. Whats funny about that is his WHIP last year is exactly the same as his career number, 1.26. That shows at least some level of consistancy, as well as a reliever who can toss more than one inning at a time, which the bullpen sorely needs by the way. At about 15 pitches per inning, he is about average for relievers, and he walks less than 1 batter per inning(.42) while striking out close to one(.92). The top 5 pitchers with the most saves last year have pretty similar numbers to that, so that is a good sign, I think.
At 31 years old, Riske seems to be one of the better middle relievers on the market, and I would much rather see a free agent signing than trading away for a one year rental of Joe Nathan, whom Doug Melvin is also feeling out. There are very few opportunities to show your value in KC, and when presented with a chance last year, Riske did just that. Think of it like this...Matt Wise no longer has to worry about hitting batters in the face, as we can now look forward to Pot-head(Turnblow), Roid-rage(Mota), and an undervalued middle reliever to close it out in the ninth.
He gets a lot of outs that arent strike outs, as evidenced by the 69 innings pitched, and 52 ks last year. Career wise, it looks pretty much the same at 431 innings and 398 ks. Whats funny about that is his WHIP last year is exactly the same as his career number, 1.26. That shows at least some level of consistancy, as well as a reliever who can toss more than one inning at a time, which the bullpen sorely needs by the way. At about 15 pitches per inning, he is about average for relievers, and he walks less than 1 batter per inning(.42) while striking out close to one(.92). The top 5 pitchers with the most saves last year have pretty similar numbers to that, so that is a good sign, I think.
At 31 years old, Riske seems to be one of the better middle relievers on the market, and I would much rather see a free agent signing than trading away for a one year rental of Joe Nathan, whom Doug Melvin is also feeling out. There are very few opportunities to show your value in KC, and when presented with a chance last year, Riske did just that. Think of it like this...Matt Wise no longer has to worry about hitting batters in the face, as we can now look forward to Pot-head(Turnblow), Roid-rage(Mota), and an undervalued middle reliever to close it out in the ninth.
Wednesday, November 28, 2007
While I Am Here
So I talked to my Dad tonight because he is going to take the family to see "A Christmas Carol" at the Pabst on Sunday for my little brother's birthday. We talked about how many deer he shot, and if I get some deer meat or not. Than he said to me "Packer fever hey?" I said that I would most likely fall asleep before the end of the first half. He responds by saying, and I quote, "That Favre will sure mess it up, wont he?" "I will probably shut it off because I am disgusted before the end of the first half." He went on to give the first football prediction he has ever given to me. Dallas 35, Green Bay 21. 4 INTs. That my friends, is fantastic. So good in fact that it gets two tags.
Beer and Politics
So I watched the YouTube debate this evening, in fact I bought a six pack of the plain to enjoy during it. Lest I be pummeled by Muntaba's vast knowledge of politics in general, here are a few highlights.....
And since he has been doing it to me...a bit for the junkie.
- Mike Huckabee has some fucked up teeth man. Its no wonder he is from Arkansas.
- Romney and Giuliani(sp for both) are snakes. Polished and wavering in there answers from one second to the next. Typical politics that will continue the same old bullshit.
- 3 candidates did not mention god, despite at least 2 questions with religious connotations. Thompson, Paul, and McCain. Thats a good thing by the way.
- Thompson, the savior for "Republicans" everywhere, was stumbling and seemed to find it hard to form a coherent thought.
- Despite my dislike for "America's Mayor," he did have the best campaign commercial mentioning both King Kong as well as a reduction in overall snowfall.
- John McCain would be a pretty good VP, in my opinion, but does not seem to have whatever it is electability is to become Pres.
- Ron Paul showed that he was a Libertarian in Republican clothing. Thats not a bad thing by the way.
- A friend of mine is big into Ron Paul. Though I like the traditional conservative values, ie the small federal government, states rights, not using the military to impose the will upon foreign countries, and fiscal responsibility with less taxing and spending, he is a rare middle of the road nut-bar who will not appeal to the "Republican" base, but may get enough votes to get out of this wretched 2 party system. The same applies to Kucinich in my opinion.
- This giving a reach around to Ronald Reagan has to stop. As that one Simpson's episode said...."Contemporize Man!!"
And since he has been doing it to me...a bit for the junkie.
Please note that this in no way endorses Dennis Kucinich or Kang for that matter...so dont blame me, I voted for Kodos.
UPDATE: This guy does a better job than I, like most people.
Sunday, November 25, 2007
Live from the lobby cam.
Guest Blog by Your Friendly Neighborhood Snow.man
edgrimly is holding me hostage in his apartment. If anyone is reading this they should immediately contact the authorities. HELP. HELP. OH God Please NOOOOO........(edgrimly is a terrible host).
Thursday, November 22, 2007
MVP
So Chopper asked me to "crunch some numbers" to determine why Jimmy Rollins was voted NL MVP. Unfortunately, I have a very rudimentary understanding of the Maths, so I will use what the fine folks at MLB.com have to say. Before I begin, lets first say that the voting by the MLB Writers Association happens at the end of the season, just before the playoffs start. So although helping the team into the playoffs is a plus, playoff performance does not matter.
The winner, Rollins, shortstop for Philadelphia. His team was right in the playoff hunt at the end of the season, and probably would not have made it had the Mets not choked on their own hubris. Have you ever actually met a Mets fan? Anyway, apparently Rollins for the first time in his career had 200 hits. Alone, not deserving of the award, but interesting nonetheless. As a result of that, and the fact that he hit 30(?....juice) homers gives him some decent offensive numbers from the leadoff hole in the line up. From that leadoff spot, Rollins scored 139 runs which was good enough for 1st in the league. All of this is pretty impressive, if you ask me. OBP: .344, SLG: .344, OPS(on base plus slugging): .875. Toss in a 87% stolen base mark, and that is a solid hitter.
Second place, Holliday, outfielder for Colorado. The Cinderella story of ought 7. Swept the Phillies out and that was the last anyone heard of Jimmy Rollins. Holliday is your prototypical corner outfielder in my opinion. The guy who everyone wants in left. 4th in the league in homers(36), 1st in RBI(137), and 3rd in SLG(.607). Hands down the best hitter on the Rockies, and throw in the old OPS over 1 and you have near perfection. I dont really like batting average, but he easily won that one as well, hitting .340. If anyone should have won, it was this guy. Arguably the NL's best pure hitter in 07.
Third place, Fielder, 1st base for the hometown team. I dont need to regale you with any of his gorilla like numbers.....Suffice to say that he raked all season. If it was not for Ned Yost choking on his own bucket of Hubris, Prince probably would have won in a landslide.
In my humble opinion, it comes down to a couple of things. When was the last time a non-playoff player was the MVP? How much did the player help his team get to the post season? And what did the players do over the course of the 162 game grind? Unfortunately, I am not a baseball writer. All three of those questions dont mean shit. I think that it is East Coast, ESPN-talking head bias. Even taking Fielder out of the equation, why would you vote for Rollins? Because he looks all child-like and innocent in his over sized cap? Because he helped his team take advantage of a colossal melt down of the real class of the NL East? Or maybe it was because you didnt think that the Rockies deserved to be there in the first place. All in all, Im not angry...Fielder will get his, and probably more than one. Rollins will come back next year with that killer of baseball players, Hubris. And Holliday will probably be traded.
UPDATE: FJM as always, does a much better job than I.
The winner, Rollins, shortstop for Philadelphia. His team was right in the playoff hunt at the end of the season, and probably would not have made it had the Mets not choked on their own hubris. Have you ever actually met a Mets fan? Anyway, apparently Rollins for the first time in his career had 200 hits. Alone, not deserving of the award, but interesting nonetheless. As a result of that, and the fact that he hit 30(?....juice) homers gives him some decent offensive numbers from the leadoff hole in the line up. From that leadoff spot, Rollins scored 139 runs which was good enough for 1st in the league. All of this is pretty impressive, if you ask me. OBP: .344, SLG: .344, OPS(on base plus slugging): .875. Toss in a 87% stolen base mark, and that is a solid hitter.
Second place, Holliday, outfielder for Colorado. The Cinderella story of ought 7. Swept the Phillies out and that was the last anyone heard of Jimmy Rollins. Holliday is your prototypical corner outfielder in my opinion. The guy who everyone wants in left. 4th in the league in homers(36), 1st in RBI(137), and 3rd in SLG(.607). Hands down the best hitter on the Rockies, and throw in the old OPS over 1 and you have near perfection. I dont really like batting average, but he easily won that one as well, hitting .340. If anyone should have won, it was this guy. Arguably the NL's best pure hitter in 07.
Third place, Fielder, 1st base for the hometown team. I dont need to regale you with any of his gorilla like numbers.....Suffice to say that he raked all season. If it was not for Ned Yost choking on his own bucket of Hubris, Prince probably would have won in a landslide.
In my humble opinion, it comes down to a couple of things. When was the last time a non-playoff player was the MVP? How much did the player help his team get to the post season? And what did the players do over the course of the 162 game grind? Unfortunately, I am not a baseball writer. All three of those questions dont mean shit. I think that it is East Coast, ESPN-talking head bias. Even taking Fielder out of the equation, why would you vote for Rollins? Because he looks all child-like and innocent in his over sized cap? Because he helped his team take advantage of a colossal melt down of the real class of the NL East? Or maybe it was because you didnt think that the Rockies deserved to be there in the first place. All in all, Im not angry...Fielder will get his, and probably more than one. Rollins will come back next year with that killer of baseball players, Hubris. And Holliday will probably be traded.
UPDATE: FJM as always, does a much better job than I.
Sunday, November 18, 2007
American Version
First Sunday in 2 Weeks that I woke up In my Bed Instead of the Floor
Saturday, November 17, 2007
That American Shite Belongs in the Drain
Here is a good one from south of the Mason-Dixon line. We ran some illegal taverns in College, but that is a lot of bottles being dumped.
Money Quote......
Money Quote......
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
